Development Project Status: Under Discussion

Forum: //www.openvpms.org/forum/medical-records-arrows-nextprev-page">http://www.openvpms.org/forum/medical-records-arrows-nextprev-page

Jira: //jira.openvpms.org/jira/browse/OVPMS-1068">http://jira.openvpms.org/jira/browse/OVPMS-1068

This project is under discussion by developers.

The following areas have filters:

- Patient -> Medical records

This area contains the Type, All & Date filters as well as the Tabs (Summary, Problems etc).

Development Project Status: Under Discussion

Often users want to be able to control whether new patient visit charges are accumulated on an existing invoice or a new invoice is created for each visit.  This is particularly true in large animal clinics where they may want each visit to be a separate invoice but still want to maintain the individual invoices as In Progress until cross checked before being marked as Completed and billed at the end of the month.

Development Project Status: Under Discussion

Currently the medical records and charging components of a typical visit are separated out into two different screens and essentially two different areas of the application.  The check-in and consulting workflow moves you sequentially between these functions but this does not suit the typical workflow habits of most veterinarians who like to be able to view clinical records, enter charges, enter clinical notes etc in no specific order.  So the medical records and charging components need to be merged into a single dialogue and used during the check in and consulting workflows.

Development Project Status: Under Discussion

OpenVPMS was developed from an Australian point of view, and as such does not support all jurisdictions. This is an umbrella project to identify changes required for different jurisdictions.

Development Project Status: Under Discussion

Forum : www.openvpms.org/forum/revisitfollowup-messages-and-clinician-patient-lists

JIRA : jira.openvpms.org/jira/browse/OVPMS-975

This has been costed. (24/9/10)

This project has had the $190 development fee added to the costing (13/10/10)

Revised 03/11/11